What Are They Smoking?
Liberals want to ban trans fats
and legalize marijuana. Does that make any sense to
you?
By WILLIAM J. BENNETT and
CHRISTOPHER BEACH
January 22, 2014
The
national debate over marijuana legalization has caught many liberals in a
confounding paradox. These liberals, who have fought vociferously for bans on
cigarettes, super-sized sodas, trans fats and other unhealthy substances, now
either advocate for the legalization of marijuana or stand unopposed to it. This is notable because, whatever else it is, marijuana
is not healthy.
In his recent New Yorker interview,
President Obama remarked , “I smoked pot as a kid, and I view it
as a bad habit and a vice, not very different from the cigarettes that I smoked
as a young person up through a big chunk of my adult life.” But then
he added, “I don’t think it is more dangerous than alcohol.” Of the
legalization in Colorado and Washington—never mind the unresolved
conflict between state and federal law—he said, “it’s important for it to go
forward.”
Got
that? The same president who signed into
law a tough federal anti-cigarette smoking bill in 2009
now supports marijuana legalization.
The
inconsistency and self-contradiction is obvious. In the name of public health, liberals wage political
war against genetically modified organisms, french fries and tubby kids, yet
stand idly by, or worse, support the legalization of a mind-impairing substance
known to be addictive and have deleterious effects on the brain.
The very same year, for example,
that Colorado
legalized marijuana, the Colorado Senate passed (without a single Republican vote) a ban on
trans fats in schools. Are we to believe eating a glazed donut is more harmful than smoking a
joint? California has already
banned trans fats in restaurants statewide, but now is on the brink of legalizing marijuana statewide
come November. Former New York City Mayor
Michael Bloomberg supported New York Gov. Andrew
Cuomo’s effort to decriminalize marijuana in New York State,
while at the same time supporting a ban on extra-large sodas. A 32-ounce Mountain Dew is bad for you, but pot isn’t?
The
logic is dumbfounding. For many years, health-conscious liberals have waged a deafening,
public war against cigarettes. Smoking bans in public places like restaurants and bars have been
enacted in states all over the country.Recently, New York City, New Jersey and several other cities and states
have extended those bans to include the newest tobacco fad—e-cigarettes. Yet, when it comes to smoking marijuana? Crickets.
What explains this obvious paradox? Do
these liberals think that marijuana is somehow less harmful than a Big Gulp
soda or a bucket of fried chicken? It’s hard to believe that’s
the case, given the vast amount of social data and medical science on the
dangers of marijuana.
William J. Bennett, former secretary
of education and director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, is a
fellow of the Claremont Institute and host of the nationally syndicated radio
show, “Morning in America.”
Christopher Beach is the show’s executive producer.
No comments:
Post a Comment